Opinion · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Consaul v. Cummings

33 App. D.C. 132

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1909-03-16
Topic
bankruptcy

Mr. Chief Justice Shepard delivered tbe opinion of tbe Court: Tbe final decree appealed from in tbis case was entered in conformity witb tbe mandate of tbis court. Tbe case bas twice before been appealed and will be found reported in 24 App. D. C. 36, and 30 App.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Consaul v. Cummings. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Mr. Chief Justice Shepard

delivered tbe opinion of tbe Court:

Tbe final decree appealed from in tbis case was entered in conformity witb tbe mandate of tbis court. Tbe case bas twice before been appealed and will be found reported in 24 App. D. C. 36, and 30 App. D. C. 540.* In tbe decisions therein were settled tbe principles governing tbe accounting directed to be taken between tbe parties.

Tbe final decree, being in accordance witb those principles, is affirmed witb costs. Affirmed.

An appeal by tbe appellants to tbe Supreme Court of tbe United States was allowed April 6, 1909.

See also S. C. 17 App. D. C. 269.—Reporter.