Opinion · Nylaw New York

PEOPLE v. SAFTCHICK, 272 App. Div. 1027 (1947)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF N.Y., Respondent, v. CARL SAFTCHICK,Appellant., 272 A.D. 1027 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1947)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction
Nylaw
Date
1947-10-20
Topic
general

PEOPLE v. SAFTCHICK, 272 App. Div. 1027 (1947) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARL SAFTCHICK,Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. October 20, 1947.[fn*] [fn*] For omitted decision of October 20, see post, p. 1038. — [REP.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PEOPLE v. SAFTCHICK, 272 App. Div. 1027 (1947). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PEOPLE v. SAFTCHICK,272 App. Div. 1027(1947)
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARL SAFTCHICK,
Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
October 20, 1947.fn*
Judgment of a city magistrate, holding a Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, convicting defendant of a violation of section 986 of the Penal Law (book-making), reversed on the law and the facts, the complaint dismissed and the fine remitted. The evidence was insufficient to establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, the guilt of defendant of the crime charged in the information. Lewis, P.J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur.
  1. For omitted decision of October 20, seepost, p. 1038. — [REP. ↩