Opinion · Nylaw New York

CLARK v. BELL AND CO., INC., 256 App. Div. 923 (1939)

DAVID H. CLARK, Respondent, v. BELL & CO., INC., Appellant. (Action No.1.)DAVID H. CLARK, Respondent, v. JOHN L. DODGE, BELL & CO., INC., andHOLLINGS-SMITH CO., INC., Appellants. (Action No. 2.), 256 A.D. 923 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1939)

Type: Opinion
Court: New York
Jurisdiction: New York
Date: 1939-02-06
Topic: general

CLARK v. BELL AND CO., INC., 256 App. Div. 923 (1939) DAVID H. CLARK, Respondent, v. BELL AND CO., INC., Appellant.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CLARK v. BELL AND CO., INC., 256 App. Div. 923 (1939). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CLARK v. BELL AND CO., INC.,256 App. Div. 923(1939)

DAVID H. CLARK, Respondent, v. BELL AND CO., INC., Appellant. (Action No.

1.)

DAVID H. CLARK, Respondent, v. JOHN L. DODGE, BELL AND CO., INC., and

HOLLINGS-SMITH CO., INC., Appellants. (Action No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

February 6, 1939.

Order denying motion of defendants for the consolidation of actions No. 1 and 2, and to strike action No. 2 from the Rockland County Trial Calendar, and for a stay in action No. 2, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.