Opinion · Nylaw New York
RILEY v. CENT. N.Y. FREIGHTWAYS, COMBINED CENT., 255 App. Div. 895 (1938)
ANNA E. RILEY, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, MARGARET C. RILEY,Respondent, v. Cent. N.Y. FREIGHTWAYS, INC., COMBINED Cent. FREIGHTWAYS,INC., ROBERT BOLLACKER, Appellants.MARGARET C. RILEY, Respondent, v. Cent. N.Y. FREIGHTWAYS, INC., COMBINEDCENTRAL FREIGHTWAYS, INC., ROBERT BOLLACKER, Appellants., 255 A.D. 895 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. 1938)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1938-11-02
- Topic
- general
RILEY v. CENT. N.Y. FREIGHTWAYS, COMBINED CENT., 255 App. Div. 895 (1938) ANNA E.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed RILEY v. CENT. N.Y. FREIGHTWAYS, COMBINED CENT., 255 App. Div. 895 (1938). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
RILEY v. CENT. N.Y. FREIGHTWAYS, COMBINED CENT.,255 App. Div. 895(1938)
ANNA E. RILEY, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, MARGARET C. RILEY,
Respondent, v. CENTRAL N.Y. FREIGHTWAYS, INC., COMBINED CENTRAL FREIGHTWAYS,
INC., ROBERT BOLLACKER, Appellants.
MARGARET C. RILEY, Respondent, v. CENTRAL N.Y. FREIGHTWAYS, INC., COMBINED
CENTRAL FREIGHTWAYS, INC., ROBERT BOLLACKER, Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.
November 2, 1938.
Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.