Opinion · Nylaw New York
CONNELLY v. DUNN, 249 App. Div. 774 (1936)
IRENE CONNELLY, an Infant, by ARTHUR CONNELLY, Her Guardian ad Litem, andARTHUR CONNELLY, Appellants, v. FRANK DUNN, Respondent., 249 A.D. 774 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1936)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nylaw New York
- Jurisdiction
- Nylaw
- Date
- 1936-12-28
- Topic
- general
CONNELLY v. DUNN, 249 App. Div. 774 (1936) IRENE CONNELLY, an Infant, by ARTHUR CONNELLY, Her Guardian ad Litem, andARTHUR CONNELLY, Appellants, v. FRANK DUNN, Respondent.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. December 28, 1936.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed CONNELLY v. DUNN, 249 App. Div. 774 (1936). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
CONNELLY v. DUNN,249 App. Div. 774(1936)
IRENE CONNELLY, an Infant, by ARTHUR CONNELLY, Her Guardian ad Litem, and
ARTHUR CONNELLY, Appellants, v. FRANK DUNN, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
December 28, 1936.
Present — Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.