Opinion · Nylaw New York

LOEB v. LOEB, 249 App. Div. 629 (1936)

ROSE B. LOEB, Respondent, v. JULIEN LOEB, Appellant., 249 A.D. 629 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1936)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1936-11-13
Topic: general

LOEB v. LOEB, 249 App. Div. 629 (1936) ROSE B. LOEB, Respondent, v. JULIEN LOEB, Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed LOEB v. LOEB, 249 App. Div. 629 (1936). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

LOEB v. LOEB,249 App. Div. 629(1936)

ROSE B. LOEB, Respondent, v. JULIEN LOEB, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

November 13, 1936.

On argument, order dated August 5, 1936, directing defendant to pay temporary alimony of $100 a week and counsel fee of $1,000, order dated August 14, 1936, denying motion for resettlement, and order dated September 15, 1936, directing defendant to pay $250 as counsel fee upon his appeal from the aforementioned orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to serve, within ten days from the entry of the order hereon, an answer by which he may at trial contest the question of alimony. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.