Opinion · Nylaw New York

ZIMMERMAN v. BROOKLYN BUS CORPORATION, 243 App. Div. 613 (1935)

PHILLIP ZIMMERMAN & Others, Respondents, v. BROOKLYN BUS CORPORATIONAppellant, & BERNARD CHERNER, Defendant.[fn*], 243 A.D. 613 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1935)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1935-01-01
Topic: general

ZIMMERMAN v. BROOKLYN BUS CORPORATION, 243 App. Div. 613 (1935) PHILLIP ZIMMERMAN and Others, Respondents, v. BROOKLYN BUS CORPORATIONAppellant, and BERNARD CHERNER, Defendant.[fn*]Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. January, 1935. [fn*] Affd., 267 N.Y. ___.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed ZIMMERMAN v. BROOKLYN BUS CORPORATION, 243 App. Div. 613 (1935). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

ZIMMERMAN v. BROOKLYN BUS CORPORATION,243 App. Div. 613(1935)

PHILLIP ZIMMERMAN and Others, Respondents, v. BROOKLYN BUS CORPORATION

Appellant, and BERNARD CHERNER, Defendant.^fn*

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

January, 1935.

Plaintiffs received injuries without any fault on their part as the result of a collision between an auto bus and a taxicab in which they were seated. The collision was brought about because of a loss of control of the auto bus by reason of an alleged collision between it and a private automobile. Judgment in favor of plaintiffs and against the corporate defendant. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P.J., and Scudder, J., dissent and vote for reversal and a new trial upon the ground that the determination of the jury as to the negligence of defendant Brooklyn Bus Corporation was against the weight of the evidence.

Affd., 267 N.Y. ___. ↩