Opinion · Nylaw New York

MATTER OF GUARINO v. ANDERSON, 234 App. Div. 775 (1931)

In the Matter of Application of LOUIS A. GUARINO & GEORGE E. MULRY,Appellants, for a Mandamus Ord. against ROBERT G. ANDERSON & Others, asSupervisors, Respondents.[fn*], 234 A.D. 775 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1931)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction
Nylaw
Date
1931-01-01
Topic
general

MATTER OF GUARINO v. ANDERSON, 234 App. Div. 775 (1931) In the Matter of the Application of LOUIS A. GUARINO and GEORGE E. MULRY,Appellants, for a Mandamus Order against ROBERT G.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF GUARINO v. ANDERSON, 234 App. Div. 775 (1931). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MATTER OF GUARINO v. ANDERSON,234 App. Div. 775(1931)
In the Matter of the Application of LOUIS A. GUARINO and GEORGE E. MULRY,
Appellants, for a Mandamus Order against ROBERT G. ANDERSON and Others, as
Supervisors, Respondents.fn*
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
November, 1931.
Order denying motion for a peremptory mandamus order unanimously affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law, upon authority ofMatter of Kilroev.Craig(208 App. Div. 93) andMatter of Chapmanv.City of New York(168 N.Y. 80).
Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ.
  1. Affd.,259 N.Y. 93. ↩