Opinion · Nylaw New York

LOSO v. SPAIN, 232 App. Div. 842 (1931)

EDWARD LOSO, Respondent, v. "PHILIP" A. Spain, First Name Fictitious TrueFirst Name Unknown to Plaintiff, Party Intended Residing at 911 GreenAvenue, Brooklyn, N.Y., Appellant., 232 A.D. 842 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1931)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction
Nylaw
Date
1931-01-01
Topic
general

LOSO v. SPAIN, 232 App. Div. 842 (1931) EDWARD LOSO, Respondent, v. "PHILIP" A. SPAIN, First Name Fictitious TrueFirst Name Unknown to Plaintiff, Party Intended Residing at 911 GreenAvenue, Brooklyn, N.Y., Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed LOSO v. SPAIN, 232 App. Div. 842 (1931). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

LOSO v. SPAIN,232 App. Div. 842(1931)
EDWARD LOSO, Respondent, v. "PHILIP" A. SPAIN, First Name Fictitious True
First Name Unknown to Plaintiff, Party Intended Residing at 911 Green
Avenue, Brooklyn, N.Y., Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
March, 1931.
The decision of this court handed down on March 13, 1931,fn*is hereby amended to read as follows: Order denying defendant's motion to dismiss complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to serve an answer within five days from service of a copy of the order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.
  1. Seeante, p. 832. — [REP. ↩