Opinion · Nylaw New York
COOGAN v. NEW YORK CITY INTERBOROUGH RAILWAY CO., 228 App. Div. 616 (1929)
WILLIAM J. COOGAN, Respondent, v. N.Y. CITY INTERBOROUGH RAILWAYCOMPANY, Appellant., 228 A.D. 616 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1929)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nylaw New York
- Jurisdiction
- Nylaw
- Date
- 1929-01-01
- Topic
- general
COOGAN v. NEW YORK CITY INTERBOROUGH RAILWAY CO., 228 App. Div. 616 (1929) WILLIAM J. COOGAN, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY INTERBOROUGH RAILWAYCOMPANY, Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed COOGAN v. NEW YORK CITY INTERBOROUGH RAILWAY CO., 228 App. Div. 616 (1929). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
COOGAN v. NEW YORK CITY INTERBOROUGH RAILWAY CO.,228 App. Div. 616(1929)
WILLIAM J. COOGAN, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY INTERBOROUGH RAILWAY
COMPANY, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
December, 1929.
Present — Dowling, P.J., Merrell, Martin, O'Malley and Proskauer, JJ.