Opinion · Nylaw New York
PEOPLE EX REL. WATERHOUSE v. CRAIG, 204 App. Div. 894 (1922)
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF N.Y. ex rel. MYRTLE S. WATERHOUSE,Respondent, v. CHARLES L. CRAIG, as Comptroller of the City of New York,and Others, Appellants., 204 A.D. 894 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1922)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nylaw New York
- Jurisdiction
- Nylaw
- Date
- 1922-01-01
- Topic
- general
PEOPLE EX REL. WATERHOUSE v. CRAIG, 204 App. Div. 894 (1922) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. MYRTLE S.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PEOPLE EX REL. WATERHOUSE v. CRAIG, 204 App. Div. 894 (1922). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PEOPLE EX REL. WATERHOUSE v. CRAIG,204 App. Div. 894(1922)
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. MYRTLE S. WATERHOUSE,
Respondent, v. CHARLES L. CRAIG, as Comptroller of the City of New York,
and Others, Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
December, 1922.
Present — Rich, Kelly, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ.