Opinion · Nylaw New York

HEATHCOTE v. LOHMAN, 193 App. Div. 882 (1920)

LOUISE HEATHCOTE, Respondent, v. WILLIAM H. LOHMAN, Appellant., 193 A.D. 882 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1920)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1920-01-01
Topic: general

HEATHCOTE v. LOHMAN, 193 App. Div. 882 (1920) LOUISE HEATHCOTE, Respondent, v. WILLIAM H. LOHMAN, Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed HEATHCOTE v. LOHMAN, 193 App. Div. 882 (1920). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

HEATHCOTE v. LOHMAN,193 App. Div. 882(1920)

LOUISE HEATHCOTE, Respondent, v. WILLIAM H. LOHMAN, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

June, 1920.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Present — Jenks, P.J., Mills, Rich, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ.