Opinion · Nylaw New York

WETTJE v. GOLDSTEIN, 188 App. Div. 935 (1919)

KATHERINE WETTJE, Respondent, v. LOUIS GOLDSTEIN, Appellant., 188 A.D. 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1919)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1919-01-01
Topic: general

WETTJE v. GOLDSTEIN, 188 App. Div. 935 (1919) KATHERINE WETTJE, Respondent, v. LOUIS GOLDSTEIN, Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. May, 1919.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed WETTJE v. GOLDSTEIN, 188 App. Div. 935 (1919). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

WETTJE v. GOLDSTEIN,188 App. Div. 935(1919)

KATHERINE WETTJE, Respondent, v. LOUIS GOLDSTEIN, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

May, 1919.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Present — Jenks, P.J., Rich, Blackmar, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ.

Decision by the Presiding Justice on Application to Appeal fromthe Appellate Term.