Opinion · Nylaw New York
WETTJE v. GOLDSTEIN, 188 App. Div. 935 (1919)
KATHERINE WETTJE, Respondent, v. LOUIS GOLDSTEIN, Appellant., 188 A.D. 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1919)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1919-01-01
- Topic
- general
WETTJE v. GOLDSTEIN, 188 App. Div. 935 (1919) KATHERINE WETTJE, Respondent, v. LOUIS GOLDSTEIN, Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. May, 1919.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed WETTJE v. GOLDSTEIN, 188 App. Div. 935 (1919). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
WETTJE v. GOLDSTEIN,188 App. Div. 935(1919)
KATHERINE WETTJE, Respondent, v. LOUIS GOLDSTEIN, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
May, 1919.
Present — Jenks, P.J., Rich, Blackmar, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ.
Decision by the Presiding Justice on Application to Appeal fromthe Appellate Term.