Opinion · Nylaw New York

FERRIL v. LECHTMAN LAUNDRY COMPANY, 174 App. Div. 918 (1916)

DOROTHY ETHEL FERRIL, an Infant, etc., by JAMES P. FERRIL, Her Guardian adLitem, Respondent, v. LECHTMAN LAUNDRY Co., Appellant., 174 A.D. 918 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1916)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1916-01-01
Topic: general

FERRIL v. LECHTMAN LAUNDRY COMPANY, 174 App. Div. 918 (1916) DOROTHY ETHEL FERRIL, an Infant, etc., by JAMES P. FERRIL, Her Guardian adLitem, Respondent, v. LECHTMAN LAUNDRY COMPANY, Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed FERRIL v. LECHTMAN LAUNDRY COMPANY, 174 App. Div. 918 (1916). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

FERRIL v. LECHTMAN LAUNDRY COMPANY,174 App. Div. 918(1916)

DOROTHY ETHEL FERRIL, an Infant, etc., by JAMES P. FERRIL, Her Guardian ad

Litem, Respondent, v. LECHTMAN LAUNDRY COMPANY, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

July, 1916.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Present — Jenks, P.J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ.