Opinion · Nylaw New York

SHOPIRO v. BERLIN, 163 App. Div. 933 (1914)

Samuel Shopiro, Respondent, v. Samuel M. Berlin & Another, Appellants., 163 A.D. 933 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department. 1914)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1914-01-01
Topic: general

SHOPIRO v. BERLIN, 163 App. Div. 933 (1914) Samuel Shopiro, Respondent, v. Samuel M. Berlin and Another, Appellants.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SHOPIRO v. BERLIN, 163 App. Div. 933 (1914). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SHOPIRO v. BERLIN,163 App. Div. 933(1914)

Samuel Shopiro, Respondent, v. Samuel M. Berlin and Another, Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.

May, 1914.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied. Held, defendants' witnesses are not necessary upon the issues raised by their original answer. If defendants give the stipulation required to retain their amended answer, they thereby elect to try the case in Onondaga county.