Opinion · Nylaw New York

CALLAHAN v. MUNSON STEAMSHIP LINE, 147 App. Div. 934 (1911)

Michael Callahan, Respondent, v. Munson S.S. Line, Appellant,Impleaded with Am. Sugar Refin. Co. of the State of New York,Defendant, 147 A.D. 934 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1911)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1911-01-01
Topic: general

CALLAHAN v. MUNSON STEAMSHIP LINE, 147 App. Div. 934 (1911) Michael Callahan, Respondent, v. The Munson Steamship Line, Appellant,Impleaded with American Sugar Refining Company of the State of New York,DefendantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. December, 1911.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CALLAHAN v. MUNSON STEAMSHIP LINE, 147 App. Div. 934 (1911). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CALLAHAN v. MUNSON STEAMSHIP LINE,147 App. Div. 934(1911)

Michael Callahan, Respondent, v. The Munson Steamship Line, Appellant,

Impleaded with American Sugar Refining Company of the State of New York,

Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

December, 1911.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on the authority ofCallahanv.Munson Steamship Line(141 App. Div. 791). Jenks, P.J., Carr, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred; Thomas, J., dissented.