Opinion · Nylaw New York

LEVY v. ROSENSTEIN, 56 App. Div. 618 (1900)

Sigismond Levy & Others, Appellants, v. Nathan Rosenstein & Others,Respondents., 56 A.D. 618 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1900)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction
Nylaw
Date
1900-01-01
Topic
general

LEVY v. ROSENSTEIN, 56 App. Div. 618 (1900) Sigismond Levy and Others, Appellants, v. Nathan Rosenstein and Others,Respondents.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. December Term, 1900.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed LEVY v. ROSENSTEIN, 56 App. Div. 618 (1900). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

LEVY v. ROSENSTEIN,56 App. Div. 618(1900)
Sigismond Levy and Others, Appellants, v. Nathan Rosenstein and Others,
Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
December Term, 1900.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
PER CURIAM:
This case was put at issue on the 10th day of May, 1900, and the appellants, instead of trying the case that there might be a decision upon the absolute rights of the parties upon common-law evidence, have contented themselves with a review of the conclusions and of the discretion of the court below, exercised upon proof made by affidavits. For the reasons given in the case ofDavisv.Rosenstein, decided at this term (ante, p. 220), we have concluded that it is not necessary to review this discretion, and we accordingly affirm this order, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Present — Van Brunt, P.J., Rumsey, Patterson, O'Brien and McLaughlin, JJ.