Opinion · Nylaw New York

ROBERTSON v. ROCKLAND CEMETERY IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, 54 App. Div. 631 (1900)

Thomas F. Robertson, Respondent, v. Rockland Cemetery ImprovementCompany & Sarah P.L. Whiton, Defendants, & Mary A. Stone, Appellant., 54 A.D. 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1900)

Type: Opinion
Court: New York
Jurisdiction: New York
Date: 1900-01-01
Topic: general

ROBERTSON v. ROCKLAND CEMETERY IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, 54 App. Div. 631 (1900) Thomas F. Robertson, Respondent, v. The Rockland Cemetery ImprovementCompany and Sarah P.L.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed ROBERTSON v. ROCKLAND CEMETERY IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, 54 App. Div. 631 (1900). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

ROBERTSON v. ROCKLAND CEMETERY IMPROVEMENT COMPANY,54 App. Div. 631(1900)

Thomas F. Robertson, Respondent, v. The Rockland Cemetery Improvement

Company and Sarah P.L. Whiton, Defendants, and Mary A. Stone, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

November Term, 1900.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

VAN BRUNT, P.J.:

For the reasons stated in the opinion in the case ofRobertsonv.Rockland Cemetery Improvement Co., decided herewith (ante, p. 191), the order appealed from must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Patterson, O'Brien, Ingraham and Hatch, JJ., concurred.