Opinion · Nylaw New York

KRAVITZ v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 285 App. Div. 1049 (1955)

ANNA KRAVITZ, Respondent, v. CITY OF N.Y., Respondent, & MAC ASPHALTCONSTRUCTION CORP., Appellant., 285 A.D. 1049 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1955)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1955-04-26
Topic: general

KRAVITZ v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 285 App. Div. 1049 (1955) ANNA KRAVITZ, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, and MAC ASPHALTCONSTRUCTION CORP., Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. April 26, 1955.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed KRAVITZ v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 285 App. Div. 1049 (1955). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

KRAVITZ v. CITY OF NEW YORK,285 App. Div. 1049(1955)

ANNA KRAVITZ, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, and MAC ASPHALT

CONSTRUCTION CORP., Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

April 26, 1955.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals or for reargument denied, with $10 costs.

Present — Peck, P.J., Cohn, Callahan, Breitel and Bastow, JJ. [Seeante, p. 926.]