Opinion · Nylaw New York

GOLDSTEIN v. GOLDSTEIN, 283 App. Div. 1012 (1954)

EDWARD GOLDSTEIN, Respondent, v. RAE S. GOLDSTEIN, Appellant, et al.,Defendants.RAE S. GOLDSTEIN, Appellant, v. EDWARD GOLDSTEIN, Respondent., 283 A.D. 1012 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1954)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1954-06-01
Topic: general

GOLDSTEIN v. GOLDSTEIN, 283 App. Div. 1012 (1954) EDWARD GOLDSTEIN, Respondent, v. RAE S. GOLDSTEIN, Appellant, et al.,Defendants.RAE S.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed GOLDSTEIN v. GOLDSTEIN, 283 App. Div. 1012 (1954). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

GOLDSTEIN v. GOLDSTEIN,283 App. Div. 1012(1954)

EDWARD GOLDSTEIN, Respondent, v. RAE S. GOLDSTEIN, Appellant, et al.,

Defendants.

RAE S. GOLDSTEIN, Appellant, v. EDWARD GOLDSTEIN, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

June 1, 1954.

Orders unanimously affirmed. No opinion.

Present — Dore, J.P., Cohn, Callahan, Bastow and Botein, JJ.