Opinion · Nylaw New York

MATTER OF KOPEC v. BUFFALO BRAKE BEAM-ACME, 279 App. Div. 945 (1952)

In the Matter of Claim of STANLEY KOPEC, Respondent, against BUFFALOBRAKE BEAM-ACME STEEL MALLEABLE IRON WORKS, Appellant.WORKMEN'S Comp. Bd., Respondent., 279 A.D. 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. 1952)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction
Nylaw
Date
1952-03-10
Topic
general

MATTER OF KOPEC v. BUFFALO BRAKE BEAM-ACME, 279 App. Div. 945 (1952) In the Matter of the Claim of STANLEY KOPEC, Respondent, against BUFFALOBRAKE BEAM-ACME STEEL MALLEABLE IRON WORKS, Appellant.WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. March 10, 1952. Motion to clarify the previous decision and order of this court so as to make the order a final order.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF KOPEC v. BUFFALO BRAKE BEAM-ACME, 279 App. Div. 945 (1952). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MATTER OF KOPEC v. BUFFALO BRAKE BEAM-ACME,279 App. Div. 945(1952)
In the Matter of the Claim of STANLEY KOPEC, Respondent, against BUFFALO
BRAKE BEAM-ACME STEEL MALLEABLE IRON WORKS, Appellant.
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.
March 10, 1952.
Motion to clarify the previous decision and order of this court so as to make the order a final order. Motion granted, without costs.
Present — Foster, P.J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ.