Opinion · Nylaw New York

SMITH v. CONTINENTAL BANK AND TR. CO. OF NEW YORK, 267 App. Div. 840 (1944)

WILLIAM E. SMITH et al., as Ex’[r, x]s of JAMES W. SMITH, Deceased,Appellants, v. Cont’l BANK & Tr. Co. OF N.Y., Respondent., 267 A.D. 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. 1944)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1944-01-12
Topic: general

SMITH v. CONTINENTAL BANK AND TR. CO. OF NEW YORK, 267 App. Div. 840 (1944) WILLIAM E.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SMITH v. CONTINENTAL BANK AND TR. CO. OF NEW YORK, 267 App. Div. 840 (1944). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SMITH v. CONTINENTAL BANK AND TR. CO. OF NEW YORK,267 App. Div. 840(1944)

WILLIAM E. SMITH et al., as Executors of JAMES W. SMITH, Deceased,

Appellants, v. CONTINENTAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.

January 12, 1944.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, with ten dollars costs. The court certifies the following question: Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action? Hill, P.J., Bliss, Heffernan and Schenck, JJ., concur.