Opinion · Nylaw New York
MATTER OF CITY OF NEW YORK, 256 App. Div. 828 (1939)
In the Matter of Application of THE CITY OF N.Y. Relative toAcquiring Title Wherever the Same Has Not Been Heretofore Acquired for theSame Purpose in Fee to the Real Prop. Required for the Opening andExtending of Union Tpk., from Austin St. to Queens Boulevard, GrandCentral Parkway, from Queens Boulevard to the Easterly City Line, Exceptingthe Lands of the Brooklyn State Hosp., Creedmoor Div., & t
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nylaw New York
- Jurisdiction
- Nylaw
- Date
- 1939-01-23
- Topic
- general
MATTER OF CITY OF NEW YORK, 256 App. Div. 828 (1939) In the Matter of the Application of THE CITY OF NEW YORK Relative toAcquiring Title Wherever the Same Has Not Been Heretofore Acquired for theSame Purpose in Fee to the Real Property Required for the Opening andExtending of Union Turnpike, from Austin Street to Queens Boulevard, GrandCentral Parkway, from Queens Boulevard to the Easterly City Line, Exceptingthe Lands of the Brooklyn State Hospital, Creedmoor Division, and the LandsAcquired for Alley Park, Utopia Parkway, from Grand Central Parkway to 32ndAvenue, Cross Island Boulevard, from Grand Central Parkway to a PropertyLine Approximately 108 Feet Southerly from Epsom Court, and Little NeckParkway, from Grand Central Parkway to Langston Avenue, in the 2d 3rd and4th Wards, Borough of Queens, City of New York.Application of HARRY KNABEL and SAMUEL LEVINE, Appellants; KEWLANE REALTY,INC., and JULIUS SHAPIRO, Respondents.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. January 23, 1939. Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Present — Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Close, JJ.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF CITY OF NEW YORK, 256 App. Div. 828 (1939). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.