Opinion · Nylaw New York

RUEFFER v. DEPT. OF AGRIC. MARKETS OF ST., N.Y., 254 App. Div. 711 (1938)

JACOB RUEFFER & MARCO MASCIARILLI, Individually & on Behalf of AllOthers Similarly Situated, Respondents, v. Dep’t OF Agric. ANDMARKETS OF THE STATE OF N.Y., HORTON V. NOYES, as Comm’r of theDepartment of Agric. & Mkts. of the State of N.Y., & Another,Appellants., 254 A.D. 711 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. 1938)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1938-04-27
Topic: general

RUEFFER v. DEPT. OF AGRIC. MARKETS OF ST., N.Y., 254 App. Div. 711 (1938) JACOB RUEFFER and MARCO MASCIARILLI, Individually and on Behalf of AllOthers Similarly Situated, Respondents, v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed RUEFFER v. DEPT. OF AGRIC. MARKETS OF ST., N.Y., 254 App. Div. 711 (1938). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

RUEFFER v. DEPT. OF AGRIC. MARKETS OF ST., N.Y.,254 App. Div. 711(1938)

JACOB RUEFFER and MARCO MASCIARILLI, Individually and on Behalf of All

Others Similarly Situated, Respondents, v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND

MARKETS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, HORTON V. NOYES, as Commissioner of the

Department of Agriculture and Markets of the State of New York, and Another,

Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.

April 27, 1938.

Motion by New York State Retail Solid Fuel Merchants Association, Inc., to intervene asamicus curiaeand to serve and file brief in support of appellants' appeal granted on condition that the brief be served and filed on or before May 9, 1938.

Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ. [166 Misc. 430.]