Opinion · Nylaw New York

MATTER OF FAGAL v. REGER, 247 App. Div. 853 (1936)

In the Matter of Application of WILLIAM FAGAL, Comm’r of PublicWelfare of the City of Schenectady, N.Y., for the Support & Maint. ofELSIE REGER, Pursuant to Section 125 of the Pub. Welfare L., Petitioner,Respondent, against JOHN REGER, Appellant., 247 A.D. 853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. 1936)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1936-01-01
Topic: general

MATTER OF FAGAL v. REGER, 247 App. Div. 853 (1936) In the Matter of the Application of WILLIAM FAGAL, Commissioner of PublicWelfare of the City of Schenectady, N.Y., for the Support and Maintenance ofELSIE REGER, Pursuant to Section 125 of the Public Welfare Law, Petitioner,Respondent, against JOHN REGER, Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. March, 1936. Appeal from Schenectady County Court.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF FAGAL v. REGER, 247 App. Div. 853 (1936). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MATTER OF FAGAL v. REGER,247 App. Div. 853(1936)

In the Matter of the Application of WILLIAM FAGAL, Commissioner of Public

Welfare of the City of Schenectady, N.Y., for the Support and Maintenance of

ELSIE REGER, Pursuant to Section 125 of the Public Welfare Law, Petitioner,

Respondent, against JOHN REGER, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.

March, 1936.

Appeal from Schenectady County Court.

Appellant's daughter, for whom he is required to provide, is twenty-seven years of age. She suffered from a stroke of infantile paralysis when two and one-half years of age. Since that time she has been badly crippled and unable to support herself. She made application to the proper authority of the city of Schenectady, her place of residence, for public relief. The daughter resides with her mother, who cares for her. The appellant has contributed nothing to the support of the daughter for more than four years prior to her application for relief. It is conceded that appellant is financially able to pay the amount directed. His contention is that he is entitled to compel the daughter to reside with him. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.