Opinion · Nylaw New York

MATTER OF JEROME, 243 App. Div. 778 (1935)

In the Matter of Application of ROSALIE JEROME, Respondent, for Paymentof Award Made for Part of Parcel 30 on the Damage Map & in the FinalDecree of the Court in the Proc. to Acquire Title to Thirteenth Streetfrom Twelfth St. to Fillmore Ave. in the Borough of Queens, City of NewYork.THE PARIS-HENCKEN Co., Appellant., 243 A.D. 778 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Depart

Type
Opinion
Court
Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction
Nylaw
Date
1935-01-01
Topic
general

MATTER OF JEROME, 243 App. Div. 778 (1935) In the Matter of the Application of ROSALIE JEROME, Respondent, for Paymentof Award Made for Part of Parcel 30 on the Damage Map and in the FinalDecree of the Court in the Proceedings to Acquire Title to Thirteenth Streetfrom Twelfth Street to Fillmore Avenue in the Borough of Queens, City of NewYork.THE PARIS-HENCKEN COMPANY, Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. March, 1935. Order directing the comptroller of the city of New York to pay to the petitioner the amount awarded for her proportionate share of damage parcel No. 30 involved in this proceeding affirmed, without costs. No opinion.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF JEROME, 243 App. Div. 778 (1935). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MATTER OF JEROME,243 App. Div. 778(1935)
In the Matter of the Application of ROSALIE JEROME, Respondent, for Payment
of Award Made for Part of Parcel 30 on the Damage Map and in the Final
Decree of the Court in the Proceedings to Acquire Title to Thirteenth Street
from Twelfth Street to Fillmore Avenue in the Borough of Queens, City of New
York.
THE PARIS-HENCKEN COMPANY, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
March, 1935.
Order directing the comptroller of the city of New York to pay to the petitioner the amount awarded for her proportionate share of damage parcel No. 30 involved in this proceeding affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.