Opinion · Nylaw New York

FELDMAN v. HIMMELSTEIN, 243 App. Div. 723 (1935)

JACOB FELDMAN, Appellant, v. SAM HIMMELSTEIN, Respondent., 243 A.D. 723 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1935)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1935-01-01
Topic: general

FELDMAN v. HIMMELSTEIN, 243 App. Div. 723 (1935) JACOB FELDMAN, Appellant, v. SAM HIMMELSTEIN, Respondent.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. February, 1935.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed FELDMAN v. HIMMELSTEIN, 243 App. Div. 723 (1935). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

FELDMAN v. HIMMELSTEIN,243 App. Div. 723(1935)

JACOB FELDMAN, Appellant, v. SAM HIMMELSTEIN, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

February, 1935.

Order denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in an action upon a non-negotiable promissory note affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (Curryv.Mackenzie,239 N.Y. 267,272.) Appeal from order denying plaintiff's motion for reargument dismissed as not appealable. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Johnston, JJ., concur.