Opinion · Nylaw New York

ETTEN v. SCHOONMAKER, 242 App. Div. 886 (1934)

D. ROY VAN ETTEN, Respondent, v. EVERETT B. SCHOONMAKER, as Tr. inBankruptcy of IRVING V.A. HUIE, INC., & Another, Defendants.THE HOME Indem. Co., Appellant., 242 A.D. 886 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. 1934)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1934-01-01
Topic: general

ETTEN v. SCHOONMAKER, 242 App. Div. 886 (1934) D. ROY VAN ETTEN, Respondent, v. EVERETT B.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed ETTEN v. SCHOONMAKER, 242 App. Div. 886 (1934). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

ETTEN v. SCHOONMAKER,242 App. Div. 886(1934)

D. ROY VAN ETTEN, Respondent, v. EVERETT B. SCHOONMAKER, as Trustee in

Bankruptcy of IRVING V.A. HUIE, INC., and Another, Defendants.

THE HOME INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.

November, 1934.

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Hill, P.J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur.