Opinion · Nylaw New York

MATTER OF CRICK v. ROGERS, 236 App. Div. 814 (1932)

In the Matter of Application of FRED J. CRICK, Respondent, for aMandamus Ord. Directing the Granting of a Bldg. Permit against GEORGE F.ROGERS, Bldg. Inspector for the Town of Bedford, Westchester County, NewYork, Appellant., 236 A.D. 814 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1932)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1932-01-01
Topic: general

MATTER OF CRICK v. ROGERS, 236 App. Div. 814 (1932) In the Matter of the Application of FRED J. CRICK, Respondent, for aMandamus Order Directing the Granting of a Building Permit against GEORGE F.ROGERS, Building Inspector for the Town of Bedford, Westchester County, NewYork, Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. October, 1932.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF CRICK v. ROGERS, 236 App. Div. 814 (1932). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MATTER OF CRICK v. ROGERS,236 App. Div. 814(1932)

In the Matter of the Application of FRED J. CRICK, Respondent, for a

Mandamus Order Directing the Granting of a Building Permit against GEORGE F.

ROGERS, Building Inspector for the Town of Bedford, Westchester County, New

York, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

October, 1932.

Peremptory mandamus order unanimously affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and in the exercise of discretion. No opinion.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.