Opinion · Nylaw New York

BAXTER v. WEBER, 235 App. Div. 772 (1932)

ANITA BAXTER, an Infant, by HELEN BAXTER, Her Guardian ad Litem, andAnother, Appellants, v. WEBER, BUNKE, LANGE COAL Co., Respondent,Impleaded with THE BIG THREE CLEANING DYEING Co., INC., Defendant., 235 A.D. 772 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1932)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1932-01-01
Topic: general

BAXTER v. WEBER, 235 App. Div. 772 (1932) ANITA BAXTER, an Infant, by HELEN BAXTER, Her Guardian ad Litem, andAnother, Appellants, v. THE WEBER, BUNKE, LANGE COAL COMPANY, Respondent,Impleaded with THE BIG THREE CLEANING DYEING COMPANY, INC., Defendant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. April, 1932.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BAXTER v. WEBER, 235 App. Div. 772 (1932). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BAXTER v. WEBER,235 App. Div. 772(1932)

ANITA BAXTER, an Infant, by HELEN BAXTER, Her Guardian ad Litem, and

Another, Appellants, v. THE WEBER, BUNKE, LANGE COAL COMPANY, Respondent,

Impleaded with THE BIG THREE CLEANING DYEING COMPANY, INC., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

April, 1932.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Present — Finch, P.J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Townley, JJ.