Opinion · Nylaw New York

POUGHKEEPSIE SAVINGS BANK v. COHEN, 229 App. Div. 789 (1930)

POUGHKEEPSIE Sav. BANK, Respondent, v. GEORGE COHEN & Others,Defendants, & WENER HOLDING CO., INC., Appellant., 229 A.D. 789 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1930)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1930-01-01
Topic: general

POUGHKEEPSIE SAVINGS BANK v. COHEN, 229 App. Div. 789 (1930) THE POUGHKEEPSIE SAVINGS BANK, Respondent, v. GEORGE COHEN and Others,Defendants, and WENER HOLDING CO., INC., Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. May, 1930.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed POUGHKEEPSIE SAVINGS BANK v. COHEN, 229 App. Div. 789 (1930). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

POUGHKEEPSIE SAVINGS BANK v. COHEN,229 App. Div. 789(1930)

THE POUGHKEEPSIE SAVINGS BANK, Respondent, v. GEORGE COHEN and Others,

Defendants, and WENER HOLDING CO., INC., Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

May, 1930.

Order denying appellant's application to vacate that part of the judgment, dated September 7, 1929, which awards an additional allowance of $961.75 to the plaintiff, reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, in so far as it denies such application, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The additional allowance was improper and the application to vacate or set aside "the erroneous and illegal part of the judgment was legal and regular." (Herpev.Herpe,225 N.Y. 323.) Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur.