Opinion · Nylaw New York

UNITED DAIRY MACHINERY CORPORATION v. TAYLOR, 229 App. Div. 749 (1930)

UNITED DAIRY Mach. Corp., Respondent, v. JAMES L. TAYLOR andANDREW TAYLOR, Appellants, Impleaded with Another, Defendant., 229 A.D. 749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department. 1930)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1930-01-01
Topic: general

UNITED DAIRY MACHINERY CORPORATION v. TAYLOR, 229 App. Div. 749 (1930) UNITED DAIRY MACHINERY CORPORATION, Respondent, v. JAMES L. TAYLOR andANDREW TAYLOR, Appellants, Impleaded with Another, Defendant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed UNITED DAIRY MACHINERY CORPORATION v. TAYLOR, 229 App. Div. 749 (1930). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

UNITED DAIRY MACHINERY CORPORATION v. TAYLOR,229 App. Div. 749(1930)

UNITED DAIRY MACHINERY CORPORATION, Respondent, v. JAMES L. TAYLOR and

ANDREW TAYLOR, Appellants, Impleaded with Another, Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.

April, 1930.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Present — Sears, P.J., Crouch, Taylor, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.