Opinion · Nylaw New York

NASSAU ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. RIEGELMANN, 212 App. Div. 883 (1925)

NASSAU Elec. R.R. Co., Respondent, v. EDWARD RIEGELMANN,Individually & as President of the Borough of Brooklyn, & Others,Appellants., 212 A.D. 883 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1925)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1925-01-01
Topic: general

NASSAU ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. RIEGELMANN, 212 App. Div. 883 (1925) NASSAU ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent, v. EDWARD RIEGELMANN,Individually and as President of the Borough of Brooklyn, and Others,Appellants.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. February, 1925.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed NASSAU ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. RIEGELMANN, 212 App. Div. 883 (1925). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

NASSAU ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. RIEGELMANN,212 App. Div. 883(1925)

NASSAU ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent, v. EDWARD RIEGELMANN,

Individually and as President of the Borough of Brooklyn, and Others,

Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

February, 1925.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Present — Kelly, P.J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Young, JJ.