Opinion · Nylaw New York

MATTER OF HINSCH, 209 App. Div. 828 (1924)

In the Matter of Petition of FRIEDA HINSCH & Another to Render andSettle Their Account as Ex’[r, x]s, etc., of LOUISE DIEHL, Late of theCounty of Kings, Deceased., 209 A.D. 828 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1924)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1924-01-01
Topic: general

MATTER OF HINSCH, 209 App. Div. 828 (1924) In the Matter of the Petition of FRIEDA HINSCH and Another to Render andSettle Their Account as Executors, etc., of LOUISE DIEHL, Late of theCounty of Kings, Deceased.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. May, 1924. Decree of the Surrogate's Court of Kings county affirmed, with costs to the respondent payable out of the estate. No opinion.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF HINSCH, 209 App. Div. 828 (1924). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MATTER OF HINSCH,209 App. Div. 828(1924)

In the Matter of the Petition of FRIEDA HINSCH and Another to Render and

Settle Their Account as Executors, etc., of LOUISE DIEHL, Late of the

County of Kings, Deceased.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

May, 1924.

Decree of the Surrogate's Court of Kings county affirmed, with costs to the respondent payable out of the estate. No opinion. Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kapper, JJ., concur; Kelby, J., dissents on the ground that the proof adduced is not sufficient to support a contract against the estate to leave by will the sum of $25,000 to the claimant.