Opinion · Nylaw New York
DAVIS, JR. v. ERDMANN, 208 App. Div. 852 (1924)
CHARLES JAY DAVIS, JR., an Infant, by CHARLES J. DAVIS, His Guardian adLitem, Respondent, v. JOHN F. ERDMANN & Others, Appellants., 208 A.D. 852 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1924)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York
- Date
- 1924-01-01
- Topic
- general
DAVIS, JR. v. ERDMANN, 208 App. Div. 852 (1924) CHARLES JAY DAVIS, JR., an Infant, by CHARLES J. DAVIS, His Guardian adLitem, Respondent, v. JOHN F.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed DAVIS, JR. v. ERDMANN, 208 App. Div. 852 (1924). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
DAVIS, JR. v. ERDMANN,208 App. Div. 852(1924)
CHARLES JAY DAVIS, JR., an Infant, by CHARLES J. DAVIS, His Guardian ad
Litem, Respondent, v. JOHN F. ERDMANN and Others, Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
April, 1924.
Present — Kelly, P.J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Kapper, JJ.