Opinion · Nylaw New York

GILL v. UNITED AMERICAN LINES, 206 App. Div. 778 (1923)

DISLINDA GILL, as Adm’r, Adm’x, etc., of ANTHONY GILL, Deceased,Respondent, v. UNITED Am. LINES, Appellant., 206 A.D. 778 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1923)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1923-01-01
Topic: general

GILL v. UNITED AMERICAN LINES, 206 App. Div. 778 (1923) DISLINDA GILL, as Administratrix, etc., of ANTHONY GILL, Deceased,Respondent, v. UNITED AMERICAN LINES, Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. June, 1923.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed GILL v. UNITED AMERICAN LINES, 206 App. Div. 778 (1923). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

GILL v. UNITED AMERICAN LINES,206 App. Div. 778(1923)

DISLINDA GILL, as Administratrix, etc., of ANTHONY GILL, Deceased,

Respondent, v. UNITED AMERICAN LINES, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

June, 1923.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Present — Kelly, P.J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Young, JJ.