Opinion · Nylaw New York

BRAMAN v. CAPITOL WOOLEN CO., INC., 198 App. Div. 1001 (1921)

CHESTER A. BRAMAN & Others, Copartners, etc., Respondents, v. THECAPITOL WOOLEN CO., INC., Appellant., 198 A.D. 1001 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1921)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1921-01-01
Topic: general

BRAMAN v. CAPITOL WOOLEN CO., INC., 198 App. Div. 1001 (1921) CHESTER A. BRAMAN and Others, Copartners, etc., Respondents, v. THECAPITOL WOOLEN CO., INC., Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BRAMAN v. CAPITOL WOOLEN CO., INC., 198 App. Div. 1001 (1921). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BRAMAN v. CAPITOL WOOLEN CO., INC.,198 App. Div. 1001(1921)

CHESTER A. BRAMAN and Others, Copartners, etc., Respondents, v. THE

CAPITOL WOOLEN CO., INC., Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

October, 1921.

Judgment and order affirmed. with costs. No opinion.

Present — Clarke, P.J., Laughlin, Smith, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ. Merrell, J., dissenting upon the ground that the trial court erred in admitting testimony as to the falling market as proof of motive on defendant's part in rejecting the merchandise, said testimony being irrelevant to the issue as to the condition of said merchandise; also, upon the ground that the trial court erred in the admission of testimony offered by the plaintiffs as to an attempted modification and cancellation of the contract between the parties, said testimony being irrelevant upon any issue herein.