Opinion · Nylaw New York

DAVIDSON v. SHECKET, 196 App. Div. 974 (1921)

ABE DAVIDSON & Others, Doing Bus. under the Firm Name, etc.,Appellants, v. BAN SHECKET, Respondent., 196 A.D. 974 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1921)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1921-01-01
Topic: general

DAVIDSON v. SHECKET, 196 App. Div. 974 (1921) ABE DAVIDSON and Others, Doing Business under the Firm Name, etc.,Appellants, v. BAN SHECKET, Respondent.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. May, 1921.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed DAVIDSON v. SHECKET, 196 App. Div. 974 (1921). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

DAVIDSON v. SHECKET,196 App. Div. 974(1921)

ABE DAVIDSON and Others, Doing Business under the Firm Name, etc.,

Appellants, v. BAN SHECKET, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

May, 1921.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Present — Blackmar, P.J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Jaycox, JJ.