Opinion · Nylaw New York
ZWEIFLER v. PUBLIC BANK OF NEW YORK CITY, 196 App. Div. 969 (1921)
SAM ZWEIFLER, Respondent, v. Pub. BANK OF N.Y. CITY, Now Known asPUBLIC Nat’l BANK, Appellant., 196 A.D. 969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1921)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nylaw New York
- Jurisdiction
- Nylaw
- Date
- 1921-01-01
- Topic
- general
ZWEIFLER v. PUBLIC BANK OF NEW YORK CITY, 196 App. Div. 969 (1921) SAM ZWEIFLER, Respondent, v. PUBLIC BANK OF NEW YORK CITY, Now Known asPUBLIC NATIONAL BANK, Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. May, 1921.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed ZWEIFLER v. PUBLIC BANK OF NEW YORK CITY, 196 App. Div. 969 (1921). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
ZWEIFLER v. PUBLIC BANK OF NEW YORK CITY,196 App. Div. 969(1921)
SAM ZWEIFLER, Respondent, v. PUBLIC BANK OF NEW YORK CITY, Now Known as
PUBLIC NATIONAL BANK, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
May, 1921.
Present — Clarke, P.J., Dowling, Page, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ.