Opinion · Nylaw New York

PHALEN v. RAE, 184 App. Div. 922 (1918)

Vict. PHALEN, as Adm’r, Adm’x, etc., Appellant, v. WALTER S. RAE,Respondent, & THE N.Y. Cent. & HUDSON RIVER R.R. COMPANY,Defendant., 184 A.D. 922 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. 1918)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1918-01-01
Topic: general

PHALEN v. RAE, 184 App. Div. 922 (1918) VICTORIA PHALEN, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. WALTER S. RAE,Respondent, and THE NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY,Defendant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PHALEN v. RAE, 184 App. Div. 922 (1918). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PHALEN v. RAE,184 App. Div. 922(1918)

VICTORIA PHALEN, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. WALTER S. RAE,

Respondent, and THE NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY,

Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.

May, 1918.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Cochrane, J., not sitting.