Opinion · Nylaw New York

KAPLAN v. BARASCH, 182 App. Div. 894 (1918)

LOUIS KAPLAN, Respondent, v. EVELYN BARASCH, Appellant, & Others,Defendants., 182 A.D. 894 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1918)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1918-01-01
Topic: general

KAPLAN v. BARASCH, 182 App. Div. 894 (1918) LOUIS KAPLAN, Respondent, v. EVELYN BARASCH, Appellant, and Others,Defendants.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. January, 1918.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed KAPLAN v. BARASCH, 182 App. Div. 894 (1918). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

KAPLAN v. BARASCH,182 App. Div. 894(1918)

LOUIS KAPLAN, Respondent, v. EVELYN BARASCH, Appellant, and Others,

Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

January, 1918.

Judgment of the County Court of Kings county affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.