Opinion · Nylaw New York
BISHOP v. KINGSTON GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, 174 App. Div. 935 (1916)
EMMA BISHOP, as Adm’r, Adm’x, etc., of ARTHUR BISHOP, Deceased,Respondent, v. KINGSTON GAS & Elec. Co., Appellant., 174 A.D. 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. 1916)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nylaw New York
- Jurisdiction
- Nylaw
- Date
- 1916-01-01
- Topic
- general
BISHOP v. KINGSTON GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, 174 App. Div. 935 (1916) EMMA BISHOP, as Administratrix, etc., of ARTHUR BISHOP, Deceased,Respondent, v. THE KINGSTON GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. September, 1916.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed BISHOP v. KINGSTON GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, 174 App. Div. 935 (1916). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
BISHOP v. KINGSTON GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,174 App. Div. 935(1916)
EMMA BISHOP, as Administratrix, etc., of ARTHUR BISHOP, Deceased,
Respondent, v. THE KINGSTON GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.
September, 1916.