Opinion · Nylaw New York

MATTER OF HOME INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, 174 App. Div. 868 (1916)

In the Matter of Application of the Home Ins. Co. of NewYork, Appellant, for an Ord. of Removal to this Court & after SuchRemoval for an Ord. Consolidating the Following Actions: (a) City Courtof the City of N.Y., Leo D. Schaffer, Trading as Hellen Dress Co.,Plaintiff, v. Home Ins. Co. of N.Y., Defendant; (b) MunicipalCourt of the City of N.Y., Borough of Manhattan, Second Dist., LeoD. Schaffer, T

Type
Opinion
Court
Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction
Nylaw
Date
1916-01-01
Topic
general

MATTER OF HOME INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, 174 App. Div. 868 (1916) In the Matter of the Application of the Home Insurance Company of NewYork, Appellant, for an Order of Removal to this Court and after SuchRemoval for an Order Consolidating the Following Actions: (a) City Courtof the City of New York, Leo D. Schaffer, Trading as Hellen Dress Co.,Plaintiff, v. Home Insurance Company of New York, Defendant; (b) MunicipalCourt of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, Second District, LeoD. Schaffer, Trading as Enterprise Dress Pleating Co., Plaintiff, v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF HOME INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, 174 App. Div. 868 (1916). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MATTER OF HOME INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK,174 App. Div. 868(1916)
In the Matter of the Application of the Home Insurance Company of New
York, Appellant, for an Order of Removal to this Court and after Such
Removal for an Order Consolidating the Following Actions: (a) City Court
of the City of New York, Leo D. Schaffer, Trading as Hellen Dress Co.,
Plaintiff, v. Home Insurance Company of New York, Defendant; (b) Municipal
Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, Second District, Leo
D. Schaffer, Trading as Enterprise Dress Pleating Co., Plaintiff, v. Home
Insurance Company of New York, Defendant. Leo D. Schaffer, Trading, etc.,
Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
June, 1916.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
Present — Clarke, P.J., McLaughlin, Scott, Smith and Page, JJ.