Opinion · Nylaw New York

FISCHER v. TRUSTEES OF VILLAGE OF CLIFTON SPRINGS, 140 App. Div. 918 (1910)

Leonard D. Fischer, Appellant, v. Trs. of the Vill. of CliftonSprings, Respondent., 140 A.D. 918 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department. 1910)

Type: Opinion
Court: New York
Jurisdiction: New York
Date: 1910-01-01
Topic: general

FISCHER v. TRUSTEES OF VILLAGE OF CLIFTON SPRINGS, 140 App. Div. 918 (1910) Leonard D. Fischer, Appellant, v. Trustees of the Village of CliftonSprings, Respondent.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed FISCHER v. TRUSTEES OF VILLAGE OF CLIFTON SPRINGS, 140 App. Div. 918 (1910). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

FISCHER v. TRUSTEES OF VILLAGE OF CLIFTON SPRINGS,140 App. Div. 918(1910)

Leonard D. Fischer, Appellant, v. Trustees of the Village of Clifton

Springs, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.

October, 1910.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, J., who dissented upon the ground that what the plaintiff did in diverting the waters of the stream while acting as water commissioner for the village does not preclude him from asserting and enforcing the right which he subsequently acquired under his deed of conveyance to have the waters of the stream run in the original channel across the lands in question, and except Robson, J., not voting.