Opinion · Nylaw New York

MILLER v. FISHER, 124 App. Div. 937 (1908)

Henry Miller, Respondent, v. Robert C. Fisher & Edward B. Tompkins,Doing Bus. under the Firm Name of Robert C. Fisher Company,Appellants., 124 A.D. 937 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. 1908)

Type: Opinion
Court: New York
Jurisdiction: New York
Date: 1908-01-01
Topic: general

MILLER v. FISHER, 124 App. Div. 937 (1908) Henry Miller, Respondent, v. Robert C. Fisher and Edward B.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MILLER v. FISHER, 124 App. Div. 937 (1908). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MILLER v. FISHER,124 App. Div. 937(1908)

Henry Miller, Respondent, v. Robert C. Fisher and Edward B. Tompkins,

Doing Business under the Firm Name of Robert C. Fisher Company,

Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

March, 1908.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce verdict to $10,600, in which event judgment as so modified and order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Settle order on notice. (Scott, J., dissenting and voting for reversal.)