Opinion · Nylaw New York

PRUYN v. GUAYAQUIL AND QUITO RAILWAY COMPANY, 115 App. Div. 881 (1906)

Robert C. Pruyn, as a S’holder of The Guayaquil & Quito RailwayCompany, etc., Respondent, v. Guayaquil & Quito Ry. Co. andOthers, Appellants., 115 A.D. 881 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department. 1906)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1906-01-01
Topic: general

PRUYN v. GUAYAQUIL AND QUITO RAILWAY COMPANY, 115 App. Div. 881 (1906) Robert C. Pruyn, as a Stockholder of The Guayaquil and Quito RailwayCompany, etc., Respondent, v. Guayaquil and Quito Railway Company andOthers, Appellants.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PRUYN v. GUAYAQUIL AND QUITO RAILWAY COMPANY, 115 App. Div. 881 (1906). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending

PRUYN v. GUAYAQUIL AND QUITO RAILWAY COMPANY,115 App. Div. 881(1906)

Robert C. Pruyn, as a Stockholder of The Guayaquil and Quito Railway

Company, etc., Respondent, v. Guayaquil and Quito Railway Company and

Others, Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department.

September, 1906.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.