Opinion · Nylaw New York

BASSETT v. SALTER, 262 App. Div. 967 (1941)

MARY F. BASSETT & Others, Respondents, v. SADIE SALTER & WILLIAM C.CASEY, Guardian ad Litem for JOHN SALTER & WILLIAM SALTER, Infants, etc.,Appellants., 262 A.D. 967 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1941)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1941-09-29
Topic: general

BASSETT v. SALTER, 262 App. Div. 967 (1941) MARY F. BASSETT and Others, Respondents, v. SADIE SALTER and WILLIAM C.CASEY, Guardian ad Litem for JOHN SALTER and WILLIAM SALTER, Infants, etc.,Appellants.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BASSETT v. SALTER, 262 App. Div. 967 (1941). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BASSETT v. SALTER,262 App. Div. 967(1941)

MARY F. BASSETT and Others, Respondents, v. SADIE SALTER and WILLIAM C.

CASEY, Guardian ad Litem for JOHN SALTER and WILLIAM SALTER, Infants, etc.,

Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

September 29, 1941.

Action under article 15, sections 500 to 508, inclusive, of the RealPage 968Property Law, by plaintiffs, as owners in fee of certain real property, to have a certain instrument of record purporting to affect the title of that real property canceled of record, and barring defendants from any and all claims to the real property in question. Judgment for the plaintiffs unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ.