Opinion · Nylaw New York

DIFATTE v. SMITH, 256 App. Div. 940 (1939)

MARY DIFATTE, as Adm’r, Adm’x, etc., of SALVATORE RIGGIO, Deceased,Respondent, v. ROBERT M. SMITH & DENNISTOWN M. BELL, Appellants., 256 A.D. 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1939)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1939-02-17
Topic: general

DIFATTE v. SMITH, 256 App. Div. 940 (1939) MARY DIFATTE, as Administratrix, etc., of SALVATORE RIGGIO, Deceased,Respondent, v. ROBERT M. SMITH and DENNISTOWN M.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed DIFATTE v. SMITH, 256 App. Div. 940 (1939). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

DIFATTE v. SMITH,256 App. Div. 940(1939)

MARY DIFATTE, as Administratrix, etc., of SALVATORE RIGGIO, Deceased,

Respondent, v. ROBERT M. SMITH and DENNISTOWN M. BELL, Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

February 17, 1939.

Appeal from Queens County.

Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs. The convenience of witnesses requires a change of venue to Suffolk county, where the accident happened. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.