Opinion · Nylaw New York

MATTER OF ASTARITA v. McGOLDRICK, 255 App. Div. 991 (1938)

In the Matter of Application of JOSEPH ASTARITA, Appellant, for an Orderagainst JOSEPH D. McGOLDRICK, as Comptroller of The City of N.Y. & asSuccessor of FRANK J. TAYLOR, FIORELLO H. LAGUARDIA, as Mayor of The City ofNew York, JOSEPH D. McGOLDRICK, as Comptroller of The City of N.Y., A.NEWBOLD MORRIS, as President of the Council of The City of N.Y., STANLEYM. ISAACS, as Borough President of the Bo

Type
Opinion
Court
Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction
Nylaw
Date
1938-12-16
Topic
general

MATTER OF ASTARITA v. McGOLDRICK, 255 App. Div. 991 (1938) In the Matter of the Application of JOSEPH ASTARITA, Appellant, for an Orderagainst JOSEPH D. McGOLDRICK, as Comptroller of The City of New York and asSuccessor of FRANK J. TAYLOR, FIORELLO H.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MATTER OF ASTARITA v. McGOLDRICK, 255 App. Div. 991 (1938). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MATTER OF ASTARITA v. McGOLDRICK,255 App. Div. 991(1938)
In the Matter of the Application of JOSEPH ASTARITA, Appellant, for an Order
against JOSEPH D. McGOLDRICK, as Comptroller of The City of New York and as
Successor of FRANK J. TAYLOR, FIORELLO H. LAGUARDIA, as Mayor of The City of
New York, JOSEPH D. McGOLDRICK, as Comptroller of The City of New York, A.
NEWBOLD MORRIS, as President of the Council of The City of New York, STANLEY
M. ISAACS, as Borough President of the Borough of Manhattan, JAMES J. LYONS,
as Borough President of the Borough of The Bronx, RAYMOND V. INGERSOLL, as
Borough President of the Borough of Brooklyn, GEORGE U. HARVEY, as Borough
President of the Borough of Queens, and JOSEPH A. PALMA, as Borough
President of the Borough of Richmond, Constituting the Board of Estimate of
The City of New York, and the Board of Estimate of The City of New York, as
Successor of the Board of Estimate and Apportionment of The City of New
York, and ALMERINDO H. PORTFOLIO, as Treasurer of the Department of Finance
of The City of New York, Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
December 16, 1938.
Page 992
Order denying petitioner's application for an order directing respondents forthwith to provide funds to pay petitioner's compensation as first deputy chief probation officer for the year 1938 and for the first six months of 1939, at the rate of $5,500 per annum, as fixed by the judges of the County Court, Kings county, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
Present — Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.