Opinion · Supreme Court of Alabama

Erwin v. Erwin

269 Ala. 632

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of Alabama
Jurisdiction: Alabama
Date: 1959-10-08
Topic: employee-benefits-and-executive-compensation

MERRILL, Justice. There being no assignment of error “bound with the transcript,” an order of affirmance is due to be entered, and it is so ordered. Supreme Court Rule 1, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix; Crim v. Gilbert, 267 Ala. 665, 104 So.2d 632; Southern Benefit Life Ins. Co. v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Erwin v. Erwin. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 5 opinions

MERRILL, Justice.

There being no assignment of error “bound with the transcript,” an order of affirmance is due to be entered, and it is so ordered. Supreme Court Rule 1, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix; Crim v. Gilbert, 267 Ala. 665, 104 So.2d 632; Southern Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. Holmes, 265 Ala. 48, 89 So.2d 530; Stidham v. Stidham, 264 Ala. 195, 86 So.2d 294; Patterson v. Gains, 264 Ala. 183, 85 So.2d 892; Wetzel v. Hobbs, 249 Ala. 434, 31 So.2d 639, and Nichols v. Hardegree, 202 Ala. 132, 79 So. 598.

Affirmed.

LAWSON, STAKELY, GOODWYN and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.